Machine Learning · Urban
Manhattan Residential Clustering
An interactive map that classifies Manhattan's residential buildings from eleven NYC datasets, using weighted K-means to reveal socio-spatial, architectural, evolutionary, and economic patterns.
Overview
Manhattan's residential buildings can be described by characteristics such as construction year,
height, and transit access. Eleven building- and street-block-level datasets were combined, merged at
the building level using the BIN (Building Identification Number) as the key, so each building can be
reasoned about across form, value, and access at once.
The scope is Manhattan's residential stock: Tax Class 1 (mostly residential property of up to three
units) and all other primarily residential property outside Class 1.
Data ingestion
The dataset was assembled from several public sources and merged at the building level on the BIN.
Records provided at the tax-lot level were expanded to individual buildings, and building attributes
were joined to street blocks for neighborhood-scale context. Subway travel time was computed
separately in Rhino + Grasshopper as a shortest-path analysis to the nearest station.
The eleven variables, their sources, and headline statistics are summarized below.
| Variable | Source | Key statistic |
|---|---|---|
| Building stories | DOF Property Valuation | Median 5 · Max 71 |
| Construction year | OTI Building | Median 1910 · 1795–2025 |
| Building height | OTI Building | Median 61.5 ft · up to 900 ft |
| Time to subway | Rhino + Grasshopper | Median 4.93 min |
| Average value | DOF Property Valuation | Median $441,500 |
| Value per sqft | DOF Property Valuation | Median $261 |
| Value change 2024–25 | DOF Property Valuation | Median +3.6% (-23% to +64%) |
| Building class | DOF Property Valuation | Mostly elevator / mixed-use |
| Elevator access | DOB elevator permits | 38.1% with · 61.9% without |
| Residential area | DOF Property Valuation | Median 1,995 sqft |
| Residential share | DOF Property Valuation | Median 91% |
Explore the building data
Each layer is a building-footprint map of one variable, aligned to Manhattan on the basemap below.
Switch layers to see how form, value, and access vary across the island.
Method: weighted K-means
K-means clustering was applied to the assembled features. Variables were normalized and given custom
weights so that the most relevant factors drove each grouping. Four weighting schemes were run, each
emphasizing a different lens, and the resulting groups were interpreted qualitatively and given
descriptive, context-specific names.
Clustering results
Four clustering lenses each tell a different story about the same building stock. Switch between them
to compare how the weighting changes which patterns emerge.